|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
346
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 17:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Aglais wrote:The Raven will not be worth it's new price. At all.
This forum needs a dislike button, too, as a note. Well maybe it will be used for pve , but what about the scorpion , noone uses it already and it costs what 90-95m isk now it will go up to 150m or such ,and what did it get +1 low slot :O
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
346
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 18:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nex apparatu5 wrote:
It's 40 million isk. It's a trivial amount
sure... |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
350
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 05:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Calathorn Virpio wrote:
i like this, points out the critical flaws
(and don't forget the Ammar BS's, CCP seems to be going along the lines of "lets **** up every ship that's NOT gallente or minmmatar")
Yeah matar fanboy devs and now the new gall fanboy dev whose favourite ship is the talos , no wonder battleships and especially not matar/gall are pretty bad.
And as others said , people wont use battleships if they think it wont worth the costs ---> probably even less minerals will be used up
Btw why not increase frigs/cruisers costs then too? They are used a lot ,could be a great miner sink ^^ Also ammo should cost much more + t1 crystals should get dmg +drones should cost ammo too great isk sinks right there :O or warping should cost fuel -> another isk sink logging on should cost isk --> another one oh and posting on forum should cost a lot this would be even better as it would greatly reduce the qq posts like this :) one is better than the other do it ccp!!!! |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
350
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 05:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Hagika wrote:
More proof in that from how they just buffed the Matar dread and removed the launchers and put it to turrets and gave it a huge bonus, turning it into pretty much the best dread in game, and said nothing about the phoenix and nothing on capital missile weapons.
:) Oh i love that dread boost , the naglfar will be so minmatar , with being just better than the other dreads it is so minmatarish.
Also love how the loki became the no1 t3 ship for pvp too, ccp-s quick reaction to nerf the tengu payed off pretty well.
Isnt it strange when a caldari boat shows up on top 20 it suddenly gets a nerf? Falcon->nerfed Drake-> nerfed+will be nerfed as it still shows up on the list Tengu->nerfed Rokh->soon to be nerfed Naga->probably will get a nerf soon^^
but when minmatar ships are there nothing is done as they work as intended,intended to be the superior ships for pvp
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
352
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 07:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Illest Insurrectionist wrote: Can I have your stuff?
By the way, these "if you don't do what i want, i'll quit" posts aren't amusing now, weren't amusing in the past and won't be amusing in the future.
they arent any worse than the "Can I have your stuff?" posts
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
352
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 08:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Aducat Ragnarson wrote:ITT:
CCP: 'BS's will get an increase in buildcost of approximately 40mil isk'
Former T1 BS 2 days ago: 90-130mil
Playerbase: 'Waaaaaah! My [former T1 BS] will cost 250million!'
90 to 130mil, 40mil increase -> 250mil
Solid mathskills... 40m avarage and they said the tier3 wont increase much or at all --> probably current tier 1 will be increased by 60-80m and tier 2 30-50m |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
352
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 10:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Roime wrote:
Fact: I won't be flying tier 1 or 2 battleships after Odyssey, their poor performance won't justify the huge ISK loss on the killboard
Do you honestly let "killboard stats" dictate your playstyle? Really?wow yup most people do that |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
353
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 14:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Shadow Lord77 wrote:Here's a little suggestion: set a flag for every battleship that was put in production before the patch. Then when someone reprocesses that battleship make it reprocess for the amount that it took to build it before the patch. And every battleship built after the patch hit just increase its base mineral amount. None of this 'extra materials' bull dung. It doesn't make any sense lore wise and the production efficiency skill doesn't factor into it, and you can't reprocess it for its newer build cost after the patch hits.
Doesn't that make sense? so how do you know which one do you buy on the market?:O |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
357
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 17:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bucca Zerodyme wrote:Thats not an productive post, i usually dont like it, but i need to post it.
I see a pattern in CCP's behavior.
1. They create a feedback thread 2. Spread nonsense 3. Waiting for Feedback 4. Reading 5 Pages 5. Adjusting some Values 6. Call it fixed and be pround, because CCP always listen to pilots 7. Never Look at that thread again, even when 100 Pages have pasted
There is a second pattern:
1. CCP claims something 2. Pilots says its not true 3. CCP says internal research showed... 4. Players asking for the data and results 5. CCP remains silence
Do you see any other patterns?
Yup 1.a group finds a good use for a crappy ship,using its advantages 2.ccp nerfs it's stats in the next expansion 3.ccp nerfs it's weapon/items it uses in the next expansion 4.ccp nerfs it's bonuses in the next expansion 5.ccp buffs its counter 6.everybody stops using it ,and probably ruining many other ships in the process 7.ccp calls it balance job nicely done
or 1.players complain about something 2.ccp ask them how they should fix it using plan A or plan B 3a,if most people voted for A ,they go with plan B 3b,if most people voted for B ,they go with plan A 4,ccp says problem nicely fixed,case closed
or 1.players complain that a ship is completly crap 2.ccp says okay we will fix it 3.ccp does a first draft how they want to fix it it is usually small meaningless buff,and at the same time give it a huge nerf 4.ccp waits for internal and player testing/feedback 5.expansion shiped out without changing anything from the first draft 6.ccp forgets the ship for another 3 years then repeats the process
or the never fading 1.players complain 2.ccp says they are avare of the problem,but they dont have time to fix it until the next expansion ,so they will look at it later, much later ,much much later, probably in the next decade ferox with rails anyone?:O
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
357
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 17:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bertie Dallocort wrote:CCP Rise wrote:Special Note: You will NOT be able to buy battleships now and then refine them for the increased cost after the changes go live. Like all previous tiericide changes we will use extra materials to implement this cost change. I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding, but couldn't I just buy a load now and sell the ships themselves off at ~40mil extra later on? not rly , probably many other people will do that + many will put production lines on, so maybe after a year its price will reach its mineral cost price :) oh and this assumes that trit price wont drop ,and that people will actually use the ships |
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
357
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 21:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
Aducat Ragnarson wrote:More tritanium in 0.0-ores-> more mining -> lower mineral prices -> lower T1 ship prices. Better production in 0.0 stations -> more competition -> lower T1 ship prices. Base mineral requirement for BS increased to get closer to former Tier3 BS build requirements. Mineral requirement increase would be worth about 40 mil in current mineral prices. In future mineral prices, the building requirement increase might be worth around 10 or 20mil and might be completely offset by the general decrease in price through lower mineral prices. But nooooooo. Lets not wait what happens and complain then! We are so perfect at economics that we know 100% what will happen in this intricate system! But instead of using that perfect knowledge to become rich in EvE, we use it to predetermine the worst scenario and then ***** about it on the forums as if it has already happend.
heh? you want to predict what will happen too what if mining will be harder+less bots ---> less minerals mined -->completly the opposite what you wrote
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
357
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 21:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cynthia Nezmor wrote:Partak Cadelanne wrote:These changes are bad. Who will fly a 250 million Scorpion? Me. I would even pay 750 mil for it as long as it is the only ECM Battleship. yeah there will allways be noobs who will buy the ship doesnt matter how costly or how ****** it is |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
363
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 20:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Aglais wrote:Hagika wrote: As of now, i seriously doubt any massive boost at all. They have done huge changes for other races and added a slot to 2 of the caldari ships, ignoring the real issues and nerfing them when they are even barely used.
P.S- Caldaqri pilots would get more love in a prison shower right now.
As someone with high missile skills and Caldari battleship 5 who has tested the new Raven on Duality- It's not good. At all. Still slow (hampered by awful capacitor and poor agility), EXCEPTIONALLY poor defense (Seriously- the NAVY AUGOROR can pretty much beat the Raven in terms of EHP- It's loads cheaper and it still does 50% of the Raven's DPS!), it has the sig of a small moon... There really are no upsides to the Raven now, at all, anymore, except maybe 'selectable damage types'. You have flight time (which was admittedly cut with the cruise missile boost), you have enemy sig/velocity penalties (which were smoothed out a bit with the cruise missile buffs, but I'm not sure how well it'll actually go), you have NO staying power whatsoever in ANY fight, you don't have the capacitor to haul your battleship into kiting range, you don't have the DPS to thwart an active tanked Dominix somehow... This ship is not worth 200 million ISK. This whole rebalancing of battleships has hit Caldari in the balls so hard that honestly they're only worth flying in the frigate and cruiser categories. You will NOT see more Ravens be flown in PvP. Likely, it'll drop off to actually being zero. Same with Scorpions. HORRIBLE sig resolution, abysmal forced armor tank, no weapons, first primary... ~180 million ISK. Not worth it. Not worth it at all. What i dont understand ,(actually i do ,they do it cause they hate caldari biased devs bleh...) why the hell the raven has to be so much shittier than fe(to which we can compare it the most) the typhoon which is pretty much a matarized raven, oh yeah matarized which means just plain better in every possible term |
|
|
|